From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ware-Martin v. City of Palmetto

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 10, 2023
8:23-cv-1229-WFJ-TGW (M.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

8:23-cv-1229-WFJ-TGW

10-10-2023

CHRISTEL WARE-MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PALMETTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM F. JUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) and the complaint (Dkt. 1). The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that the motion be deferred for a ruling to permit Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Dkt. 3. The time for filing objections has passed.

The Court reviews the legal conclusions de novo in the absence of an objection. See LeCroy v. McNeil, 397 Fed.Appx. 554, 556 (11th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted); Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994). The magistrate judge, in a thorough analysis, found that the complaint (Dkt. 1) does not satisfy basic pleading requirements in both form and factual content. In addition to the pleading deficiencies, the allegations fail to state the basis for federal jurisdiction, particularly in view of the Florida criminal and civil statutes listed without any supporting facts. The magistrate judge also noted that the Defendants are generally entitled to some type of immunity, depending on whether they are a member of the judiciary, a local appointed or elected official, or law enforcement. For the reasons explained in the Report and Recommendation, and in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court rules as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 3) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and made a part of this order.

2. Ruling on Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) is deferred pending an opportunity for Plaintiff to file within thirty days a cognizable amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and substantive federal law.

3. Plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 1) is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, if so desired, in accordance with the Report and Recommendation within thirty (30) days. If an amended complaint is not timely filed, this matter will be closed without further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ware-Martin v. City of Palmetto

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Oct 10, 2023
8:23-cv-1229-WFJ-TGW (M.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Ware-Martin v. City of Palmetto

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTEL WARE-MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PALMETTO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

8:23-cv-1229-WFJ-TGW (M.D. Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)