From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardrick v. Robare

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 10, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-186 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-186 Erie.

August 10, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on August 16, 2006 and was referred to Chief United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The chief magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on July 16, 2007 [35], recommends that the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, Motion For Summary Judgment [20] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at the United States Penitentiary at Beaumont, Texas, where he is incarcerated, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th Day of August, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, Motion For Summary Judgment [20] be granted.

The report and recommendation of Chief Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated July 16, 2007 [35], is adopted as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

Wardrick v. Robare

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 10, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-186 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Wardrick v. Robare

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WARDRICK, Plaintiff, v. ASSOC. WARDEN S.L. ROBARE, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 10, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-186 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 2007)