Opinion
2:24-cv-158-DPM-ERE
12-17-2024
TONY EUGENE WARDLOW PLAINTIFF v. MAHARAJ ALEXANDRO TOMAR DEFENDANT
ORDER
Defendant Maharaj Alexandro Tomar has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, a statement of facts, and a brief in support arguing that: (1) the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Wardlow's official capacity claims; and (2) Mr. Wardlow failed to exhaust his administrative remedies regarding any claim related to his Ozempic prescription before filing this lawsuit. Docs. 9, 10, 11. Pro se plaintiff Tony Eugene Wardlow has a right to file a response.
At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e). This means that Mr. Wardlow's response should include his legal arguments, as well as affidavits, prison records, or other evidence to show that there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.
The affidavit must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1746, by including the following statement before the date and signature: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.” Additionally, the affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit. The Court may not consider an affidavit unless it meets these requirements.
In addition, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Mr. Wardlow must separately file a “separate, short and concise statement of the material facts as to which [he] contends there is no genuine dispute to be tried.” Mr. Wardlow's statement of disputed facts must state whether he “agrees” or “disagrees” with the factual statements in each of the numbered paragraphs in Defendant Tomar's statement of undisputed facts. Doc. 10. If Mr. Wardlow disagrees with any of the facts in Defendant Tomar's statement of undisputed facts, he must: (1) identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts he disputes; (2) for each paragraph, explain why he disputes those facts; and (3) include a citation to the evidence he is relying on to support his version of the disputed fact.
The Local Rules for the Eastern District of Arkansas are available on the internet. See https://www.are.uscourts.gov/court-info/local-rules-and-orders/local-rules.
If Mr. Wardlow relies on documents that have been previously filed in the record, he must specifically refer to those documents by docket number and page. The Court will not sift through the file to find support for Mr. Wardlow's factual contentions. See Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004) (affirming the grant of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages of the record that supported his position).
Defendant Tomar's motion for partial summary judgment concerns: (1) whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Mr. Wardlow's official capacity claims against Defendant Tomar; and (2) whether Mr. Wardlow fully and properly exhausted the grievance process as to his claim related to his Ozempic prescription before filing this lawsuit. Therefore, Mr. Wardlow's response to the motion should focus on those issues.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Mr. Wardlow has until January 7, 2025, to file: (1) a response to Defendant Tomar's motion for partial summary judgment; and (2) a separate statement of disputed facts. As to any filing, Mr. Wardlow should attempt to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions in this Order.
2. Mr. Wardlow is advised that the failure to timely and properly file a response and statement of disputed facts may result in: (1) all of the facts in Defendant Tomar's statement of undisputed facts being deemed admitted, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); and (2) the possible dismissal of Mr. Wardlow's claims, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.