From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardlaw v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 28, 2022
Civil Action 21-1942 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1942

04-28-2022

EXAVIER L. WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILLYCAM, ANTHONY MAZZA, CHARLES GREGORY, DENISE JAMES, UNDERWOOD SELBY, ELIZABETH ESTRADA, ERNEST OWENS, G.G. NIKPOUR, JIHAD AL I, KYLE ODOM, LAUREN SETTLES, LIZ FITZGERALD, LORNE PEART, MELANIE HARRIS, PASCALE VALLEE, SHAMEKA SAWYER, SUSAN HAUCK


ORDER

KEARNEY JUDGE

AND NOW, this 28th day of April 2022, upon considering the City of Philadelphia's and individual Defendants' Motions to dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 28, 29), as supplemented (ECF Doc. No. 32) consistent with our April 6, 2022 Order (ECF Doc. No. 31), no timely opposition, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motions to dismiss (ECF Doc. Nos. 28, 29) are GRANTED requiring:

1. We DISMISS this case with prejudice finding there is no possible basis to plead a claim within our subject matter jurisdiction; and, 2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Wardlaw v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 28, 2022
Civil Action 21-1942 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Wardlaw v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:EXAVIER L. WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILLYCAM, ANTHONY MAZZA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-1942 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 2022)