From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardana v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
Case No. 7:12-CV-32-HL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 7:12-CV-32-HL-MSH 28 U.S.C. § 2241

06-26-2012

RANGGA KARYA WARDANA, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, FELICIA SKINNER, JANET NAPOLITANO, and BARBARA WALRATH, Respondents.


ORDER

The Recommendation (Doc. 10) of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles is before the Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 7) filed by Defendants be granted and the § 2241 petition filed by Petitioner dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has not filed an objection to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judges decision. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is granted. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice.

________________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE
mbh


Summaries of

Wardana v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Jun 26, 2012
Case No. 7:12-CV-32-HL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Wardana v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:RANGGA KARYA WARDANA, Petitioner, v. ERIC HOLDER, FELICIA SKINNER, JANET…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2012

Citations

Case No. 7:12-CV-32-HL-MSH (M.D. Ga. Jun. 26, 2012)