distinguishing between "a religious practice which is a positive expression of belief and a religious commandment which the believer may not violate at peril of his soul."
Summary of this case from Sandeford v. PlummerNo. 93-7548.
March 21, 1994, October TERM, 1993.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 F. 3d 873.
distinguishing between "a religious practice which is a positive expression of belief and a religious commandment which the believer may not violate at peril of his soul."
Summary of this case from Sandeford v. PlummerFull title:WARD v. WALSH
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 21, 1994
The "existence of obvious, easy alternatives may be evidence that the regulation is not reasonable." Ward v.…
Washington v. GarciaAdditionally, in Ward v. Walsh, the court did not apply Smith, stating that "[d]etermining to what extent…