Opinion
Argued December 21, 1893
Decided January 16, 1894
Quincy Van Voorhis for appellant.
Theodore Bacon for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except BARTLETT, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Ward v. the Rochester Electric Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 16, 1894
141 N.Y. 561 (N.Y. 1894)
Summaries of
Ward v. the Rochester Electric Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 16, 1894
141 N.Y. 561 (N.Y. 1894)
Case details for
Ward v. the Rochester Electric Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:BRIDGET WARD, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v . THE ROCHESTER…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 16, 1894
Citations
141 N.Y. 561 (N.Y. 1894)
57 N.Y. St. Rptr. 866
Citing Cases
Winter v. Crosstown Street R. Co.
The question is different with regard to plaintiff's negligence. It is not claimed but that if he had looked…