From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Stratton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
2:20-cv-2083 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2083 DB P

07-27-2021

MARCUS WARD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH STRATTON, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is defendant's request for a stay of these proceedings. (ECF No. 21.) Defendant's counsel states that defendant is in the process of retaining new counsel. This court finds good cause for a stay. However, this court expects defendant to resolve the question of his representation in a timely manner.

Accordingly, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's request for a stay of these proceedings (ECF No. 21) is granted. This case will be stayed for 30 days from the filed date of this order to permit defendant to retain new counsel.

2. The settlement conference set for August 9, 2021 before Magistrate Judge Delaney is vacated.

3. The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued on June 30, 2021 is vacated.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the warden of Salinas Valley State Prison.


Summaries of

Ward v. Stratton

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 27, 2021
2:20-cv-2083 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Ward v. Stratton

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS WARD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH STRATTON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 27, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-2083 DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2021)