Opinion
3:22-cv-00435-ART-CSD
10-21-2022
ROBIN WARD, Plaintiff, v. PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, and DOES 1-50, inclusive Defendants.
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP SCOTT M. MAHONEY, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant, Panasonic Corporation of North America SANTOS LAW, PLLC Theresa M. Santos, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP SCOTT M. MAHONEY, ESQ. Attorney for Defendant, Panasonic Corporation of North America
SANTOS LAW, PLLC Theresa M. Santos, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties' counsel of record that Defendant will have an extension of time up to and including November 4, 2022 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). Defense counsel needs additional time because he has recently been retained and needs to further investigate the facts before filing a response. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED: