From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Oromde

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P.

February 11, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

On January 14, 2011, defendants filed a motion for summary judgement, which was served on plaintiff the same day. On February 3, 2011, the court received notice from plaintiff that he did not receive a complete copy of defendants' motion. Accordingly, defendants reserved the motion and counsel confirmed with plaintiff that he had received a complete copy on February 7, 2011.

As plaintiff had not received a complete copy of the motion for summary judgment until February 7, 2011, he will be provided additional time in which to file his opposition. Therefore, plaintiff may file a response to the motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 10, 2011


Summaries of

Ward v. Oromde

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Ward v. Oromde

Case Details

Full title:GLYNN WARD, Plaintiff, v. OROMDE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2011)