Ward v. Oromde

Full title: GLYNN WARD, Plaintiff, v. OROMDE, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2542-CMK-P.

September 2, 2011

ORDER

CRAIG KELLISON, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 45). The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 45) is denied.

DATED: September 1, 2011