From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. North Carolina

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 27, 2022
No. 22-6897 (4th Cir. Dec. 27, 2022)

Opinion

22-6897

12-27-2022

JOHNATHAN WENDELL WARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; BEN CARVER, Respondents-Appellees.

Johnathan Wendell Ward, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: December 20, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:22-hc-02074-M)

Johnathan Wendell Ward, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Wendell Ward seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust his state court remedies. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ward has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Ward v. North Carolina

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 27, 2022
No. 22-6897 (4th Cir. Dec. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Ward v. North Carolina

Case Details

Full title:JOHNATHAN WENDELL WARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 27, 2022

Citations

No. 22-6897 (4th Cir. Dec. 27, 2022)