From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. New York State Electric Gas Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 15, 1943
290 N.Y. 325 (N.Y. 1943)

Opinion

Argued March 9, 1943

Decided April 15, 1943

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, GILBERT, J.

George A. King and A.J. Rodenbeck for appellant. A.H. Harpending for respondent.



We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no testimony in this record to support a jury finding that defendant failed to comply with a definite notice or warning that the wires had to be removed before a fixed date. However, it was still a question of fact for the jury as to whether under all the circumstances defendant had reason to anticipate that the crane might come into contact with the wires and as to whether defendant's failure thereafter to remove the wires was negligent.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur; LEHMAN, Ch. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Ward v. New York State Electric Gas Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 15, 1943
290 N.Y. 325 (N.Y. 1943)
Case details for

Ward v. New York State Electric Gas Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LIZZIE WARD, as Administratrix of the Estate of STANLEY C. WARD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 15, 1943

Citations

290 N.Y. 325 (N.Y. 1943)
49 N.E.2d 159

Citing Cases

Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Foreseeability is much more evident in this case than it was in regard to laying a sewer line in Mikolasko.…

Pike v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint…