From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Midcarolina Bank

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Feb 16, 2010
1:09CV241 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2010)

Opinion

1:09CV241.

February 16, 2010


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on October 16, 2009, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss [Doc. 10] is GRANTED and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action is entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Ward v. Midcarolina Bank

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Feb 16, 2010
1:09CV241 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Ward v. Midcarolina Bank

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. WARD, Plaintiff, v. MIDCAROLINA BANK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

Citations

1:09CV241 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2010)