From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Luckey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 17, 2013
Case No. 12-14875 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 17, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-14875

04-17-2013

NATHANIEL WARD-EL, Plaintiff, v. JIM LUCKEY, Defendant.


HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH


ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DOC. # 13)

Before the court is an untitled document filed by pro se plaintiff Nathaniel Ward-El, a state prisoner, in response to the Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson's order denying reconsideration of her order striking plaintiff's motion to compel. The court is construing this as an objection to the magistrate judge's order.

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against the law librarian at the Cooper Street Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan in November 2012, alleging wrongful retaliation for filing a grievance and denial of access to the law library. Shortly after filing his complaint, plaintiff filed a document he entitled "Request Motion to Compel Discovery" (Doc. # 5). The magistrate judge, noting that the "motion" was actually a request for discovery as to defendant, who had not yet been served, entered an order striking the filing. Plaintiff then filed a motion for reconsideration of the order, which was denied.

While it appears from the record that the defendant has now been served with process, the plaintiff's objection to the magistrate judge's ruling remains meritless. As provided in the orders of the magistrate judge, this court has no authority or mechanism for serving a party's discovery requests. Accordingly, the court finds no error in the magistrate judge's determination, and overrules plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's order. Any discovery desired by plaintiff must be pursued in compliance with the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which apply to pro se litigants just as to those represented by counsel. Plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel, which he includes in his objections, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

April 17, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on

Nathaniel Ward-El #240660, West Shoreline Correctional

Facility (MTF), 2500 S. Sheridan Drive, Muskegon, MI 49444.


Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Ward v. Luckey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 17, 2013
Case No. 12-14875 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 17, 2013)
Case details for

Ward v. Luckey

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL WARD-EL, Plaintiff, v. JIM LUCKEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 17, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-14875 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 17, 2013)