From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Flex-O-Tube Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 8, 1954
216 F.2d 954 (6th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11989.

October 8, 1954.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Levin, Judge.

Smith Huffaker, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Beaumont, Smith Harris, Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


This appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing upon the merits their court action, brought to recover damages for alleged unjust enrichment arising out of a compromise agreement between the defendant appellees and the United States with relation to excess profits taxes, has been duly considered and heard upon the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys and upon the record in the cause:

From all of which it appears that the judgment of the district judge was correct for the reasons stated in his succinct opinion;

Accordingly, the judgment, D.C., 112 F. Supp. 658, is affirmed.


Summaries of

Ward v. Flex-O-Tube Company

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 8, 1954
216 F.2d 954 (6th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

Ward v. Flex-O-Tube Company

Case Details

Full title:John L. WARD and Richard DE TAMBLE, Appellants, v. FLEX-O-TUBE COMPANY and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 8, 1954

Citations

216 F.2d 954 (6th Cir. 1954)