From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Evans

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 21, 2009
CV 03-2076-DSF (JWJ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)

Opinion


KEVIN LANELL WARD, Petitioner, v. MIKE S. EVANS, WARDEN, Respondents. No. CV 03-2076-DSF (JWJ) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. September 21, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. The Court concurs with and adopts the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that the First Amended Petition filed herein is dismissed with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by the United States mail on petitioner and counsel for respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Ward v. Evans

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 21, 2009
CV 03-2076-DSF (JWJ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Ward v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN LANELL WARD, Petitioner, v. MIKE S. EVANS, WARDEN, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2009

Citations

CV 03-2076-DSF (JWJ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Cloud v. State

[¶ 84] It is well established that the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution does not require…