Ward v. City of Sparks

Full title: FREDERICK LOUIS WARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SPARKS, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 9, 2011

3:09-CV-0007-RCJ-VPC (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2011)

Opinion

3:09-CV-0007-RCJ-VPC.

February 9, 2011

ORDER

ROBERT JONES, District Judge

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Valerie P. Cooke, (#123) entered on January 12, 2011, recommending Plaintiff's second amended complaint (#94) be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Defendants' motion to strike (#111) be granted and plaintiff's amended complaints (#104/#109) by stricken. Plaintiff did not file a timely objection to the Report and Recommendation, but did file a Motion (# 128/#129) for an extension of time to file an objection. The Court denies Plaintiff's Motion (#128/#129).

The Court has conducted it's de novo review in this case and has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#123) entered on January 12, 2011, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#123) entered on January 12, 2011, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion (#128/#129) for an extension of time is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike (#111) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's amended complaints (#104/#109) are stricken.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this action and terminate it in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: this 9th day of February, 2011.