Ward v. City of Henderson

Full title: BRIDGET WARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA; and DOES 1 through…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 28, 2022

2:20-cv-02331-JAD-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02331-JAD-NJK

01-28-2022

BRIDGET WARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HENDERSON, NEVADA; and DOES 1 through X Defendant.

GARG GOLDEN LAW FIRM ANTHONY B. GOLDEN. ESQ. COUNSEL TO DEFENDANT CITY OF HENDERSON. NEVADA DEANNA L. FORBUSH FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP COLLEEN E. MCCARTY ESQ. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF BRIDGET WARD

JENNIFER A. DORSEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

GARG GOLDEN LAW FIRM ANTHONY B. GOLDEN. ESQ. COUNSEL TO DEFENDANT CITY OF HENDERSON. NEVADA

DEANNA L. FORBUSH

FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP COLLEEN E. MCCARTY ESQ. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF BRIDGET WARD

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND STAY

(SECOND REQUEST)

JENNIFER A. DORSEY U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

The Parties, Plaintiff Officer Bridget Ward ("Officer Ward") and Defendant City of Henderson O'COH") (collectively the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to continue the stay in the instant matter for twenty-one (21) days from the date of entry of this order to allow the Parties additional time to continue settlement discussions. In the event this matter does not resolve on or before that date, the Parties shall have an additional twenty (20) days to tile a new proposed Scheduling Order or any appropriate motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED. This case is STAYED through February 18, 2022.