From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2016
Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS)

09-19-2016

ERIC WARD, Petitioner v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition and all pleadings, motions, and other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

Nothing in the Objections affects or alters the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1)the Petition is DENIED; and /// ///

(2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: September 19, 2016

/s/_________

R. GARY KLAUSNER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ward v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2016
Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)
Case details for

Ward v. California

Case Details

Full title:ERIC WARD, Petitioner v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-09588-RGK (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2016)