Opinion
Civil Action 4:22-2974
07-07-2023
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
ANDREW S. HANEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court in the above referenced proceeding is Plaintiff s Motion to Remand this case to the 125th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas (Doc. No. 16); Defendants' Response (Doc. No. 23); Plaintiffs Reply (Doc. No. 24); and Judge Sheldon's Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 39) that the Court grant the Motion to Remand be denied. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. No. 42) to Judge Sheldon's Memorandum and Recommendation and Defendants filed a Response to Plaintiffs objections (Doc. No. 44).
The Court has carefully reviewed, de novo, the filings, the applicable law, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation, and the objections and response thereto, and agrees with the Magistrate Judge's conclusion that removal of Plaintiff s claim does not disturb any balance between federal and state judicial responsibilities because the common law questions that require resolution are properly before this court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. No. 42) are OVERRULED; the Memorandum and Recommendation (Doc. No. 39) is ADOPTED; and Plaintiffs Motion to Remand this case to the 125th Judicial District of Harris County, Texa (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED.