From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wander v. White House Furs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1976
54 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 22, 1976


In an action on two promissory notes, commenced by service of a summons and a notice of motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated June 8, 1976, which denied the motion and directed him to serve a formal complaint. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff's time to serve his complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. The affidavits and exhibits submitted by the parties raised the following three factual issues: first, whether defendants Paul Kling and Anthony Pavlides are individually liable on the notes, as their signatures were followed by their representative titles of "VP" and "Sec" (see Hellawell v Busch Son, 248 App. Div. 737); second, the manner in which interest is to be determined, since the notes made no provision for interest; and third, whether defendant White House Fur Salon, Ltd., is liable (the name of that entity does not appear on the notes). Accordingly, Special Term properly denied plaintiff's motion. Gulotta, P.J., Hopkins, Martuscello and Suozzi, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wander v. White House Furs, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 22, 1976
54 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Wander v. White House Furs, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MORTIMER WANDER, Appellant, v. WHITE HOUSE FURS, INC., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 963 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)