From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wamboldt v. Aurora Pittsburgh, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-1280 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1280

11-28-2012

HARRY WAMBOLDT, Plaintiff, v. AURORA PITTSBURGH, LLC, et al., Defendants.


Judge Cathy Bissoon


ORDER

Pursuant to the parties Motion, this case hereby is STAYED. For the duration of the stay, this case is and shall remain ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Administrative closings comprise a familiar way in which courts remove cases from their active files without final adjudication. Penn West Assocs., Inc. v. Cohen, 371 F.3d 118, 127 (3d Cir. 2004) (citation and internal quotations omitted). Administrative closure is a docket control device used by the Court for statistical purposes, and it does not prejudice the rights of the parties in any manner. Honig v. Comcast of Georgia I, LLC, 537 F. Supp.2d 1277, 1290 n.8 (N.D. Ga. 2008).

As and when appropriate, any party may restore this action to the Court's active calendar upon application or by motion. See In re Arbitration Between Philadelphia Elec. Co. v. Nuclear Elec. Ins., Ltd., 845 F. Supp. 1026, 1028 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (holding same).

IT IS SO ORDERED. cc (via ECF email notification): All Counsel of Record

______________

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wamboldt v. Aurora Pittsburgh, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 28, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-1280 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Wamboldt v. Aurora Pittsburgh, LLC

Case Details

Full title:HARRY WAMBOLDT, Plaintiff, v. AURORA PITTSBURGH, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1280 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 28, 2012)