From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 29, 1941
36 N.E.2d 640 (N.Y. 1941)

Opinion

Argued June 11, 1941

Decided July 29, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, MILLER, J.

Stanley P. Meyerson and Edward L. Coffey for appellant.

Milton Turkel for respondent.


The record presents issues of fact concerning negligence and freedom from contributory negligence. The washing of the floor of a store during business hours presents a different situation from the cleaning of the stairs of an apartment house ( Samuels v. Terry Holding Co., 253 N.Y. 593) or the floor of a railroad station ( Curtiss v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co., 233 N.Y. 554).

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. (See 286 N.Y. 700.)

LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ., concur; LEHMAN, Ch. J., dissents.

Judgments reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 29, 1941
36 N.E.2d 640 (N.Y. 1941)
Case details for

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BERTA WALZ, Appellant, v. PAUL HELFER, INC., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 29, 1941

Citations

36 N.E.2d 640 (N.Y. 1941)
36 N.E.2d 640

Citing Cases

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 286 N.Y.…

Surface v. Safeway Stores

Safeway has argued that, even if it was error to direct a verdict on contributory negligence, the judgment…