From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waltzer v. Waltzer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 3, 1989
549 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-2006.

October 3, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Richard S. Fuller, Judge.

Genet Milner and Donald G. Criscuolo, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Lawrence H. Rogovin, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and COPE, JJ.


Affirmed.

SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN, J., concur.


In my view the record does not contain substantial competent evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that the appellant has the present ability to pay $2,000 in order to purge himself of civil contempt for failure to pay child support and alimony required by the decree in the parties' dissolution of marriage. See Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). Appellee's arguments may be entirely appropriate on an indirect criminal contempt, but not a civil contempt. I would reverse the order under review.


Summaries of

Waltzer v. Waltzer

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 3, 1989
549 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Waltzer v. Waltzer

Case Details

Full title:GRAIG A. WALTZER, APPELLANT, v. LESLIE A. WALTZER, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 3, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)