From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jun 26, 2003
No. 01-03-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)

Opinion

No. 01-03-00290-CR

Opinion issued June 26, 2003 Do not publish. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 339th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 936371

Panel consists of Justices HEDGES, NUCHIA, and KEYES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant pleaded guilty to delivery of cocaine and, in accordance with a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for two years. Appellant filed timely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 25.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, in pertinent part: In a plea bargain case — that is, a case in which a defendant's plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant — a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court's certification of defendant's right of appeal states that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NOright of appeal." (Emphasis in original.) See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d). We also note that appellant waived his right to appeal. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Walton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Jun 26, 2003
No. 01-03-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)
Case details for

Walton v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN KEITH WALTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Jun 26, 2003

Citations

No. 01-03-00290-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 26, 2003)