From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walton v. Lockheed Martin Aircraft Center

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 18, 2011
407 F. App'x 764 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-2261.

Submitted: January 13, 2011.

Decided: January 18, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:09-cv-00462-HMH).

Michael Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Wendy Lyn Furhang, Stephanie E. Lewis, Andreas Neal Satterfield, Jr., Jackson Lewis, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Walton appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation granting summary judgment in favor of Lock-heed Martin on Walton's Title VII and breach of contract claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walton v. Lockheed Martin Aircraft Ctr., No. 6:09-cv-00462-HMH, 2010 WL 3951512 (D.S.C. Oct. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Walton v. Lockheed Martin Aircraft Center

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 18, 2011
407 F. App'x 764 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Walton v. Lockheed Martin Aircraft Center

Case Details

Full title:Michael WALTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOCKHEED MARTIN AIRCRAFT CENTER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2011

Citations

407 F. App'x 764 (4th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc.

While at-will employment can be altered by an oral promise, “to be binding an oral offer must be definite in…