From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walton v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15cv119 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15cv119

08-22-2017

CEDRIC BERNARD WALTON v. CHARLES BELL


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Cedric Bernard Walton, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights action. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record in this matter. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. An appropriate final judgment shall be entered. The dismissal of this lawsuit is based on plaintiff's failure to provide the court with a current address. If plaintiff wishes to have this case reinstated on the court's active docket, he may do so by providing the court with a current address within 30 days of the date set forth below.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 22 day of August, 2017.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Walton v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15cv119 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Walton v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:CEDRIC BERNARD WALTON v. CHARLES BELL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 22, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:15cv119 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2017)