From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walthorn v. Law Offices of Baxter

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 2, 2006
File No. 1:05-CV-757 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2006)

Opinion

File No. 1:05-CV-757.

August 2, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The parties agree that the case should be dismissed with prejudice, however, they do not agree on whether the Court should award Defendant costs and attorney fees. Plaintiff filed this suit under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. ("FDCPA"). The FDCPA allows a court to award a defendant reasonable attorney fees and costs where an action has been "brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment." 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(1)(3). There has been no showing of bad faith or harassment that would justify an award of attorney fees and costs. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal (Docket #17) is GRANTED IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket #15) is DENIED AS MOOT.


Summaries of

Walthorn v. Law Offices of Baxter

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 2, 2006
File No. 1:05-CV-757 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Walthorn v. Law Offices of Baxter

Case Details

Full title:ROGER WALTHORN and LINDA WALTHORN, Plaintiffs, v. LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2006

Citations

File No. 1:05-CV-757 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 2006)