From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walters v. Venetian Resort Hotel & Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-00431-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-cv-00431-APG-VCF

06-02-2015

ARTHUR TERRY WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. THE VENETIAN RESORT HOTEL AND CASINO, et al., Defendant.


REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This matter involves pro se Plaintiff Arthur Terry Walters' civil action against the Venetian Resort Hotel & Casino.

On March 20, 2015, the court denied Walters' application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered him to pay the court's filing fee by April 2, 2015. (Doc. #5).

On March 30, 2015, Walters appealed the court's order to the Ninth Circuit. (Doc. #7).

On May 19, 2015, the Ninth Circuit granted Walters' "motions for voluntary dismissal." (Doc. #10).

On May 21, 2015, the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon, U.S. District Judge, ordered that the Ninth Circuit's "mandate be spread upon the records of this Court in this matter."

To date, no filing fee has been paid. In accordance with this court's March 20, 2015 order, the court recommends that Walters' complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to pay the court's filing fee.

ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,

IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Pursuant to Local Special Rule 2-2, the Plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party of the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this Rule may result in dismissal of the action. See LSR 2-2.

DATED this 2nd day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

CAM FERENBACH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Walters v. Venetian Resort Hotel & Casino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 2, 2015
Case No. 2:15-cv-00431-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Walters v. Venetian Resort Hotel & Casino

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR TERRY WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. THE VENETIAN RESORT HOTEL AND CASINO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 2, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:15-cv-00431-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 2, 2015)