Opinion
Civil Action No. 04-cv-00374-EWN-OES.
September 28, 2005
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on the "Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge" filed September 7, 2005. No party has objected to the recommendation. I have conducted the requisite de novo review of the issues, the record, and the recommendation. Based on this review, I have concluded that the recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. The recommendation (#32) is ACCEPTED.
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#20) filed September 21, 2004 is DENIED.
3. Claim One of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed June 8, 2004 is DISMISSED sua sponte, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
4. Plaintiff may proceed in this action on Claims Two, Three and Four of his Second Amended Complaint with Claim Five being allowed only as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1).