From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walters v. Harlow

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-579 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-579.

June 1, 2010


ORDER


The above captioned case was initiated on May 12, 2009, by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. no. 1) accompanied by a Complaint. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 32), filed on April 22, 2010, recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 26) be granted. Plaintiff filed Objections on May 6, 2010 (doc. no. 33). After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 26) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 32) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated April 22, 2010, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if he so desires.


Summaries of

Walters v. Harlow

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 1, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-579 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Walters v. Harlow

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY WALTERS, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL HARLOW; FRED RUFFO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 1, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-579 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 1, 2010)