Opinion
Submitted April 19, 1881
Decided May 10, 1881
Samuel Hand for appellant.
George W. Ellis for respondents.
Per Curiam opinion for modification as above stated.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Walter v. Fowler
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1881
85 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1881)
Summaries of
Walter v. Fowler
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1881
85 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1881)
Case details for
Walter v. Fowler
Case Details
Full title:THOMAS H. WALTER et al., Respondents, v . JONATHAN O. FOWLER, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 10, 1881
Citations
85 N.Y. 621 (N.Y. 1881)
Citing Cases
World's Dispensary Medical Assn. v. Collier
It is, however, pertinent to add that motions to strike out parts of pleadings as irrelevant are not favored.…
Uggla v. BrokawIt is contended, however, that this authority to strike out matter as irrelevant or redundant does not extend…