From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walter Stubblefield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 26, 1936
95 S.W.2d 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)

Opinion

No. 18414.

Delivered June 3, 1936. Rehearing Denied (Without Written Opinion) June 26, 1936.

Theft — Indictment.

Motion to quash indictment for theft of cattle because it used the term "one head of cattle" held properly overruled.

Appeal from the District Court of Walker County. Tried below before the Hon. S.W. Dean, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for theft of cattle; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for two years.

Affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

Robert B. Smither, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The State's Attorney before this court accurately portrays the record. According to the appellant's confession, introduced in evidence by the State, a cow belonging to the injured party came on to his premises. He killed her, dressed the carcass, and attempt to dispose of the meat by selling it. He hid the hide and head and certain other parts. As a result of this confession, the hide and head were found and identified. The injured party testified that the property or cow was taken without her consent.

Appellant did not testify as a witness in his own behalf. It was his defensive theory that he should be acquitted because after the cow had been stolen he had made restitution to the injured party by paying her therefor.

The motion to quash the indictment because it used the term, "one head of cattle" was properly overruled. See Branch's Ann. P. C., sec. 2552.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Walter Stubblefield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 26, 1936
95 S.W.2d 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)
Case details for

Walter Stubblefield v. State

Case Details

Full title:WALTER STUBBLEFIELD v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 26, 1936

Citations

95 S.W.2d 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1936)
95 S.W.2d 418

Citing Cases

Wood v. State

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HELD SUFFICIENT NOTWITHSTANDING A MOTION TO QUASH WAS FILED See, "merchandise, exact…

Cook v. State

Courtney v. State, 3 Tex. App. 257 (1877); Coleman v. State, 21 Tex. App. 520, 2 S.W. 859 (1887); 25A Tex.…