From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Park v. Holdren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2018
Case No. 1:17-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:17-cv-439

08-01-2018

WALTER E. PARK, III, Plaintiff, v. GREG HOLDREN, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 30)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on April 20, 2018 submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 30). No objections were filed.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety.

Accordingly:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) is ADOPTED;

2. Defendant Greg Holdren's motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED; and

3. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint (Doc. 18) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 8/1/18

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Park v. Holdren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2018
Case No. 1:17-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Park v. Holdren

Case Details

Full title:WALTER E. PARK, III, Plaintiff, v. GREG HOLDREN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 1, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:17-cv-439 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2018)