From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh v. Weber

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Sep 9, 2016
379 P.3d 1150 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 113,972

09-09-2016

Kenneth Walsh, In His Capacity as Successor Trustee of The Unilda V. Moffat Revocable Trust, and as Executor of The Estate of Unilda V. Moffat, Deceased, Appellees, v. Bill Weber, Individually and in His Capacity as Executor of The Estate of Annita L. Weber, Deceased, Appellants, and Kenny Dainty, as Administrator of The Estate of Donald R. Weber, Deceased, Defendant.

Levi H. Goossen, of Goossen Law Office, of Newton, for appellant. William P. Tretbar and Adam R. Burrus, of Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, L.L.C., of Wichita, for appellee.


Affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Walsh v. Weber

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Sep 9, 2016
379 P.3d 1150 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Walsh v. Weber

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Walsh, In His Capacity as Successor Trustee of The Unilda V…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Sep 9, 2016

Citations

379 P.3d 1150 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016)

Citing Cases

United Capital Mgmt. of Kan. v. Nelson

Under Kansas law, unjust enrichment occurs when a party provides a benefit to another, the other party…

N. Nat. Gas Co. v. L.D. Drilling, Inc.

"The statute of limitations for an unjust enrichment claim begins to run when all of the elements of unjust…