From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued January 23, 1911

Decided February 7, 1911

Thomas E. O'Shea, appellant, in person.

Harold H. Bowman and Artemas B. Smith, for plaintiff, respondent.

Roger Foster for New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, defendant, respondent.

Louis Edwin Bomeisler for Mary E. Thomson, defendant, respondent.

Arthur Lovell for Arthur Lovell, defendant, respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, HAIGHT, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ. Absent: VANN, J.


Summaries of

Walsh v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 7, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Walsh v. New England Mutual Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET E. WALSH, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of WILLIAM…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 7, 1911

Citations

94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
201 N.Y. 520