From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 17, 1962
17 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 17, 1962

Present — Bergan, P.J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, which required defendant to accept service of the second amended complaint, which had previously been rejected by defendant's attorney when served upon him within 20 days after service of defendant's answer to an amended complaint served pursuant to an order permitting service of the same. The amendment accomplished by the second amended complaint was an increase in the amount of the demand for damages. A "pleading may be once amended by the party, of course" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 244) and such "amendment of course is not precluded * * * by a previous amendment by leave of court". (4 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, § 15, pp. 548-549, citing, inter alia, Guenther v. Ridgway Co., 173 App. Div. 790; Hall v. Galban Co., 164 App. Div. 873; O'Connell v. Wilson, 162 App. Div. 392.) Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Walsh v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 17, 1962
17 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Walsh v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:FRED D. WALSH, Respondent, v. EUGENE S. MARTIN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 17, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch v. Sharf

The Supreme Court correctly rejected CLI's contention that the plaintiffs should not have been permitted to…