From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsh v. Andrews Florist on 4th St.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 28, 2022
8:21-cv-2696-VMC-CPT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-cv-2696-VMC-CPT

12-28-2022

MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Plaintiff, v. ANDREWS FLORIST ON 4TH STREET INC. and BLANCA MICHAELS, Defendants.


ORDER

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZTOVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 19), filed on December 9, 2022, recommending that Secretary Martin J. Walsh's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 17) be denied.

As of the date of this Order, no objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has lapsed. The Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation, and denies the Secretary's Motion as set forth herein.

Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F.Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. The Secretary has not adequately alleged that the employee was covered by the FLSA through either individual or enterprise coverage. (Doc. # 19 at 5-10). The Court will allow the Secretary to amend the complaint to address this deficiency.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 19) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

(2) The Secretary's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. # 17) is DENIED.

(3) The Secretary's Complaint (Doc. # 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

(4) The Secretary may file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Walsh v. Andrews Florist on 4th St.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Dec 28, 2022
8:21-cv-2696-VMC-CPT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Walsh v. Andrews Florist on 4th St.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

8:21-cv-2696-VMC-CPT (M.D. Fla. Dec. 28, 2022)