From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walsam 316, LLC v. 316 Bowery Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 4, 2019
171 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8894 Index 153318/17

04-04-2019

WALSAM 316, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. 316 BOWERY REALTY CORP. et al., Defendants, 4–6 Bleecker Street LLC, Defendant–Appellant.

Herrick, Feinstein LLP, New York (Sean E. O'Donnell of counsel), for appellant. Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York (Mitchell Schrage of counsel), for respondents.


Herrick, Feinstein LLP, New York (Sean E. O'Donnell of counsel), for appellant.

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York (Mitchell Schrage of counsel), for respondents.

Sweeny, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Kern, Oing, Singh, JJ.

The court properly cancelled 4–6 Bleecker's notice of pendency. Pursuant to CPLR 6501, "[a] notice of pendency may be filed in any action ... in which the judgment demanded would affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property, except in a summary proceeding brought to recover the possession of real property." Here, 4–6 Bleecker seeks only a money judgment and has not asserted any claim that would directly affect title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property.

Based on the foregoing, this Court need not address appellant's remaining arguments.


Summaries of

Walsam 316, LLC v. 316 Bowery Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 4, 2019
171 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Walsam 316, LLC v. 316 Bowery Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Walsam 316, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. 316 Bowery Realty…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 2019

Citations

171 A.D.3d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 2619
95 N.Y.S.3d 801