From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walls v. Vancil

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 23, 1999
7 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75905.

November 23, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; PHILIP D. HEAGNEY, Judge.

James G. Nowogrocki, St. Louis, for appellant.

Matthew A. Schroeder, Union, for respondent.

Before RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, JJ.


ORDER


Lucinda Vancil appeals the trial court's judgment that William Walls is entitled to an equitable lien on real estate purchased with money advanced by him and his now-deceased wife. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(1).


Summaries of

Walls v. Vancil

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 23, 1999
7 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Walls v. Vancil

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. WALLS, RESPONDENT, v. LUCINDA VANCIL, APPELLANT, AND CHARLES…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 23, 1999

Citations

7 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)