From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walls v. Prestige Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

February 24, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, J.), entered January 2, 2008, which granted plaintiffs' motion to consolidate the instant action with an action previously commenced in Civil Court, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Gonzalez, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.


The motion court appropriately exercised its discretion in consolidating this action with an action that was previously commenced by plaintiff Vanessa Walls pro se in Civil Court ( see CPLR 602). The two cases present an identity of issues and common questions of law and fact, and defendants have failed to demonstrate that consolidation will prejudice a substantial right ( Amcan Holdings, Inc. v Torys LLP, 32 AD3d 337, 339).


Summaries of

Walls v. Prestige Management

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 24, 2009
59 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Walls v. Prestige Management

Case Details

Full title:VANESSA R. WALLS et al., Respondents, v. PRESTIGE MANAGEMENT, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 311 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
872 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

Walls v. Prestige Management, Inc.

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the consolidation, holding that the two actions…

Kozon v. Kozon

In opposition to respondent's showing, petitioner has failed to sustain her responsive burden of establishing…