From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.

U.S.
Nov 5, 1990
498 U.S. 959 (1990)

Summary

applying Wilder analysis; upholding private enforcement of "editorial control" provisions in Cable Communications Policy Act

Summary of this case from Albiston v. Maine Commissioner of Human Services

Opinion

No. 90-460.

November 5, 1990


C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 898 F. 2d 1544.


Summaries of

Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.

U.S.
Nov 5, 1990
498 U.S. 959 (1990)

applying Wilder analysis; upholding private enforcement of "editorial control" provisions in Cable Communications Policy Act

Summary of this case from Albiston v. Maine Commissioner of Human Services

acknowledging Florida's adoption of the "transactional" test set forth in Restatement (2d) of Judgments § 24

Summary of this case from Puff 'N Stuff of Winter Park, Inc. v. Federal Trust Bank, F.S.B.

noting that plaintiffs' adversary complaint that repeated plan objections was “an impermissible collateral attack on the order confirming the plan. Because the claims raised in the [plaintiffs'] adversary complaint were already raised, or could have been raised, in their objection to confirmation, we hold that the doctrine of claim preclusion bars them from relitigating those claims.”

Summary of this case from Shield v. Northfield Labs. Inc. (In re Northfield Labs. Inc.)
Case details for

Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:WALLIS ET UX. v. JUSTICE OAKS II, LTD., ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 5, 1990

Citations

498 U.S. 959 (1990)
111 S. Ct. 387

Citing Cases

In re West Jefferson Amusement Public Park Auth

37. The sale of the Outlet Center Property to VOC shall, pursuant to Section 1123(a)(5)(D) of the Bankruptcy…

In re Varat Enterprises, Inc.

Rules of claim preclusion provide that if the later litigation arises from the same cause of action as the…