From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walling v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 8, 1920
225 S.W. 1096 (Tex. Crim. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 6011.

Decided December 8, 1920.

Gaming — Betting — Insufficiency of the Evidence.

Where, upon trial of unlawfully playing and betting at a game played with dice called "craps," there was no testimony showing that a bet was made at the game, the conviction could not be sustained under Article 557, P.C., following Looper v. State, 56 Tex. Crim. 498, and other cases.

Appeal from the County Court of Knox. Tried below before the Honorable J.M. Morgan.

Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully betting at a game played with dice called "craps;" penalty, a fine of $25.

The opinion states the case.

J.S. Kendall, for appellant.

Alvin M. Owsley, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


It was charged that appellant "did unlawfully play and bet at a game played with dice, called craps." Of this charge he was convicted, and a fine of $25 assessed against him.

Two witnesses testified on behalf of the State. The appellant offered no testimony. The witness Trott testified that he had played a game of craps with the appellant at a certain place named by him. The other witness disclaimed any transaction of the kind. This constitutes all the evidence, and the record is absolutely bare of any testimony showing that a bet was made at the game. It is the bet, or wager, that is denounced by the statute, Article 557, P.C. Absence of proof of this essential fact renders the evidence insufficient to support the judgment. Looper v. State, 56 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Lucas v. State, 57 Tex.Crim. Rep..

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Walling v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Dec 8, 1920
225 S.W. 1096 (Tex. Crim. App. 1920)
Case details for

Walling v. the State

Case Details

Full title:EMORY WALLING v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Dec 8, 1920

Citations

225 S.W. 1096 (Tex. Crim. App. 1920)
225 S.W. 1096