From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walling v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 11, 2011
Case No. C11-5204 JRC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C11-5204 JRC.

April 11, 2011


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis as amended (ECF No. 3) is GRANTED. (ECF No. 1 is stricken, as incorrect documents filed.) Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $350.00 filing fee.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses submitted by plaintiff to enable proper service of the complaint on the appropriate parties. It is the responsibility of plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney to properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Walling v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 11, 2011
Case No. C11-5204 JRC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Walling v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS A. WALLING, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Apr 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. C11-5204 JRC (W.D. Wash. Apr. 11, 2011)