From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallin v. Alfaro

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00281-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00281-WDM-MJW.

July 10, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me the Plaintiff's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum. Plaintiff is in custody at the Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility. He seeks to be brought to Denver to participate in the trial of this matter, scheduled to commence July 24, 2006. His reasons are that it would be best that he testify in person in order that the jury can best observe him when determining credibility and, at the time of his petition, he was proceeding pro se and management of the case on a long distance basis would be very difficult. Since counsel has now entered his appearance for plaintiff, this second factor is no longer a concern.

After full consideration of this matter I conclude that the petition should be denied. A prisoner does not have the absolute right to be present at his civil trial. See Price v. Johnston, 334, U.S. 266, 285-86 (1988). In deciding whether to grant a writ or not I should consider the plaintiff's need to be present against the concerns of expense,


Summaries of

Wallin v. Alfaro

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00281-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Wallin v. Alfaro

Case Details

Full title:OLOYEA D. WALLIN, Plaintiff(s), v. MR. ALFARO, et al., Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 10, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00281-WDM-MJW (D. Colo. Jul. 10, 2006)