Wallen v. Ortiz

Full title: RICHARD ALLEN WALLEN, Petitioner, v. JOE ORTIZ, Executive Director…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 9, 2009

Case No. 06-cv-01644-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 9, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 06-cv-01644-PAB-BNB.

September 9, 2009

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on the petitioner's Motion for Clarification on How to Proceed in Nondispositive Matters [Doc. #40, filed 09/03/2008] (the "Motion"). The Motion is DENIED.

The petitioner requests the following:

that the Magistrate Judge or the District Judge establish an orderly and efficient schedule for filing objections to nondispositive matters that permits the parties: (1) to await the Magistrate Judge's final report before deciding whether to object to preliminary or procedural actions taken by the Magistrate Judge before producing the report; and (2) to respond to each other's objections and file counterobjections.

Objections to the orders of a magistrate judge must conform with Rule 72, Fed.R.Civ.P., which provides in part that a party may file objections to a magistrate judge's order within 10 days after being served with a copy of the order. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a).

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.