From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 2006
942 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D06-3415.

December 6, 2006.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ana I. Gardiner, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00-13875 CF10A.

Jerome Wallace, Raiford, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Prior report: 901 So.2d 998.


Jerome Wallace appeals a final order denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for further review of claim three. This point concerns Wallace's legally-sufficient allegation that counsel failed to investigate and call an alleged alibi witness to testify at trial. Badger v. State, 933 So.2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Nelson v. State, 875 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2004). On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether counsel was ineffective such that Wallace suffered the requisite prejudice. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 695-96, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). We affirm as to all other claims.

STEVENSON, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wallace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 2006
942 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Wallace v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jerome WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 6, 2006

Citations

942 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)