From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Neiman Marcus Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-859-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-859-M

03-16-2012

MARIA F. WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. NEIMAN MARCUS CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge concerning Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Brief in Support, filed December 9, 2011 (doc. 22). No objections were filed. Having reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error and finding none, the Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant's Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Brief in Support, filed December 9, 2011 (doc. 22) is DENIED.

_________________________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Wallace v. Neiman Marcus Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 16, 2012
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-859-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Wallace v. Neiman Marcus Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARIA F. WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. NEIMAN MARCUS CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-859-M (N.D. Tex. Mar. 16, 2012)