From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 27, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-183

08-27-2018

DARYL WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO, et al., Defendants.


ENTRY AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 28) BY MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEFENDANTS AND DEFENDANT JERRID CAMPBELL'S REQUEST FOR REPRESENTATION UNDER OHIO REVISED CODE 2744.07(C)

This case is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) filed by the Montgomery County Defendants. In response to the Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant Jerrid Campbell requested a hearing regarding Montgomery County's duty to defend under Ohio Rev. Code 2744.07. The Montgomery County Defendants concur with Campbell that "the only way to interpret the plain language of Ohio Revised Code 2744.07(C) is that an oral hearing must occur concerning a duty to defend, if requested by either the political subdivision or the employee." (Doc. 37 at 2.) The Court therefore orders the parties appear at a hearing on September 25, 2018 at 1:30 PM regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment and, specifically, the duty to defend under Section 2744.07.

DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Monday, August 27, 2018.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wallace v. Montgomery Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 27, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Wallace v. Montgomery Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DARYL WALLACE, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 27, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-183 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 27, 2018)